Validity of self-reported measures for periodontitis surveillance in a rural sample.

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the predictive performance of self-reported questions for periodontitis screening in a representative sample of a rural population. METHODS: Nine questions were compared with gold standard clinical examinations (probing six sites/tooth, full-mouth). Case definition for severe periodontitis was defined according to World Workshop (2017-WW) and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention/American Academy of Periodontology (CDC/AAP). Diagnostic tests such as sensitivity (SN), specificity (SP), positive and negative predictive values were performed for all questions alone and grouped into models. Binary logistic regression modeling was used to derive parameter estimates for all variables in a given model and the area under ROC curve was calculated. RESULTS: Clinical examinations showed a prevalence of periodontitis in the sample (n = 585) of 99.4% and 86.3%, being 40.3% and 33.8% of severe disease according to 2017-WW and CDC/AAP case definitions, respectively. Individually, only the questions regarding the self-perception of teeth/gum health and loose and lost teeth were valid to predict severe periodontitis. The best logistic regression models combined sociodemographic variables and risk-factors with the self-reported measures of self-perception of gum disease, teeth/gum health, loose teeth and history of tooth loss. CONCLUSION: Predictive performance of these self-reported questions presented herein support its potential use for surveillance of severe periodontitis in rural populations with high periodontitis prevalence.

Periodontal treatment outcomes during pregnancy and postpartum.

OBJECTIVE: This study was conducted to compare periodontal therapy outcomes during pregnancy and after delivery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred nine pregnant women up to the 20th gestational week (GW) were randomized into two groups: the test group (comprehensive periodontal therapy during pregnancy) and the control group (comprehensive periodontal therapy after delivery). Periodontal examinations comprised plaque index (PI), gingival index (GI), periodontal probing depth (PPD), clinical attachment level (CAL), bleeding on probing (BOP), and gingival crevicular fluid (GCF) volume. After baseline examination, women in the test group received periodontal treatment up to the 24th GW. The final examination was performed at the 26th to the 28th GW. Women in the control group were treated 30 days after delivery and reexamined 30 days after treatment. RESULTS: Periodontal therapy significantly reduced periodontal inflammation in both groups. The mean percentage of sites with BOP was reduced from 49.14 % (±22.49) to 11.10 % (±7.84) and from 45.71 % (±17.86) to 8.07 % (±5.21) in the test and control groups, respectively (p = 0.95). No statistically significant differences were observed between groups concerning PI, GI, PPD, CAL, and GCF. The reduction in mean percentage of sites with BOP stratified for initial PPD ≥4 mm was higher in the control group (p < 0.01), but no differences were seen regarding GCF in these sites. CONCLUSIONS: Hormonal changes during pregnancy do not interfere in treatment outcomes in women with widespread gingival inflammation and limited periodontal destruction. The role of these hormonal changes in pregnant women with different disease patterns remains uncertain. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Periodontal health can be reestablished irrespective of the hormonal challenge that takes place during pregnancy.